Publisher’s Summary:
Caught up in a moment of boyhood competition, William Bellman recklessly aims his slingshot at a rook resting on a branch, killing the bird instantly. It is a small but cruel act, and is soon forgotten. By the time he is grown, with a wife and children of his own, William seems to have put the whole incident behind him. It was as if he never killed the thing at all. But rooks don’t forget…
Years later, when a stranger mysteriously enters William’s life, his fortunes begin to turn—and the terrible and unforeseen consequences of his past indiscretion take root. In a desperate bid to save the only precious thing he has left, he enters into a rather strange bargain, with an even stranger partner. Together, they found a decidedly macabre business.
And Bellman & Black is born.
My Thoughts:
This one has been sitting in my virtual TBR pile since before it was published. For some reason, it just never managed to rise up to the top of the pile. But, since I had gotten it originally through NetGalley and never written a review, I decided it was time to remedy that.
This was my third book by Setterfield (I previously read The Thirteenth Tale and Once Upon a River. Going back over my reviews of those two books, I find that I feel very much the same about this one as I did those two. There are parts that are very intriguing and drew me in; but, overall, I felt that it was uneven. In this one, I also felt that I never quite "got" what Setterfield was trying to tell me. Why would a man, who as a young boy had done something that so many young boys do, be punished for the rest of his life for it? Why does the source of his misery also allow him to become so very successful in his career? Why does it kill off the people his was with that fateful morning - why do they deserve to die to punish him? And why spread their deaths out so far as to appear as though they were not related at all? And why take so long to punish him at all? Why wait until he is a grown man, happily married, with a family he adores and a career he excels at?
Far more questions than answers for me. I'm not opposed to having a book raise questions that stick with me after finishing the book. But this doesn't strike me as the type of book that's aiming to do that, nor the types of questions that an author would typically raise to cause a reader to think more deeply.
So I'm sorry to say that this isn't a book I'd recommend, although I did enjoy much of the writing and a great deal of the story.



